Flora Grace Dozier v. United States Department of Education

Good Law
892 F.2d 1045·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18997
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 198988-2953California305 words

Opinion

Opinion

892 F.2d 1045 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Flora Grace DOZIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-2953. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1989. * Decided Dec. 14, 1989. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Flora Grace Dozier appeals pro se from the judgment of the district court dismissing with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(1), 37(b)(2)(C) and 41(b), her employment discrimination claim against the United States Department of Education for failure to obey court orders and to participate in discovery proceedings. We review the dismissal for abuse of discretion. Malone v. United States Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir.1987). 3 The district court made every reasonable effort to accommodate Ms. Dozier. Ms. Dozier's repeated failures to comply with discovery requests and judicial orders were identified by the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.