Ferdik v. Arizona Dept. of Corrections

892 F.2d 1045 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael Henry FERDIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Flamenco Mental Health Center, James McFadden, Warden, Art Boorujy, Walter White, J. Medina, Flamenco Mental Health Center, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-2866. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 13, 1989. * Decided Dec. 14, 1989. Before FARRIS, PREGERSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff-appellant Ferdik appeals pro se the district court's granting of defendants' motion for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Arizona Department of Corrections, the Flamenco Mental Health Center, and four Center personnel. Ferdik's complaint asserts that these personnel denied him access to the mails, assaulted him, and subjected him to continuing intimidation and threats, in violation of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and the eighth amendment's…