Owsichek v. McCartney

Good Law
892 F.2d 1046·1989 WL 155404·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18996
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 198988-3977California337 words

Opinion

Opinion

892 F.2d 1046 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth D. OWSICHEK, Lorane Owsichek, individually and dba/Fishing Unlimited, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Keith MCCARTNEY, individually and special agent of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, James Hogue, individually and as special agent for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Walter Soroka, individually and as special agent for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Larry Hood, individually and as special agent for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, John Does, I-XV, agents and/or employees of USA and Department of Interior of USA and/or U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, National Park Service, State of Alaska, Roger Contour, individually and as former Director of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior for Alaska, Kathleen McQuire, individually and as Assistant Attorney General for the State…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.