Pawan Kumar v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

892 F.2d 1046 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Pawan KUMAR, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 88-7455. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1989. * Decided Dec. 22, 1989. Before WALLACE, PREGERSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Kumar petitions for review of an order of deportation entered by the immigration judge (IJ) and affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). See Jaa v. INS, 779 F.2d 569, 571 (9th Cir.1981). We deny the petition. 2 * Kumar is a native and citizen of India illegally residing in the United States. On May 10, 1986, the Immigration and Naturalization Service issued an order to show cause, notice of hearing, and warrant for arrest of Kumar alleging that he had illegally entered the country. Kumar was deemed deportable pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(2). At a hearing on July 16, 1986, Kumar…