Sands v. Crist

Good Law
892 F.2d 1046·1989 WL 155439·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18977
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 198989-15502California2,282 words

Opinion

Opinion

892 F.2d 1046 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Royce Calvin SANDS, II Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roger CRIST, Warden, Arizona Correctional Training Center, Jose Cardenas, Caseworker, W.E. Pachnowski, Investigator, William Lackey, Investigator, et al., Defendant-Appellees. No. 89-15502. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1989. * Decided Dec. 15, 1989. Before WALLACE, PREGERSON, and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Royce Sands, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals in pro se from the order granting summary judgment in favor of the named defendants (prison officials) and the denial of his motion for partial summary judgment. We affirm. PERTINENT FACTUAL BACKGROUND 3 On October 18, 1988, Sands filed a verified complaint against the prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The complaint asserts that the prison officials denied him the right to confidential communications with his attorneys while he was in the prison's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.