William J. Link v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service

Good Law
892 F.2d 1046·1990 WL 253·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 3, 199088-15153California611 words

Opinion

Opinion

892 F.2d 1046 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William J. LINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-15153. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 13, 1989. * Decided Jan. 3, 1990. Before FARRIS, PREGERSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Link, a former letter carrier of the United States Postal Service, claims that his termination from postal employment was an act of discrimination based upon his age and handicap. The district court granted the Postal Service's motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We affirm. 3 A federal employee may bring a Title VII employment discrimination action in federal court only after exhausting administrative remedies. Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 832 (1976). The administrative complaint regulations governing federal employee discrimination actions based on age and disability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.