United States v. Richard Benedict, United States of America v. Richard Benedict

Good Law
892 F.2d 1047
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 198988-10004California1,680 words

Opinion

Opinion

892 F.2d 1047 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard BENEDICT, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard BENEDICT, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 88-10004, 88-10000. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 15, 1989. * Decided Dec. 22, 1989. Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, BRUNETTI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Richard Benedict ("Benedict") timely appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider its previous denial of motions for modification of his sentences pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Appellant Benedict was sentenced to serve eighteen months in prison pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4205 (b)(2) after having pled guilty to conspiracy to commit tax fraud. Benedict was ordered to serve this sentence concurrently with another eighteen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.