United States v. Paul Matthew Jackson

892 F.2d 1047 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Matthew JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant No. 88-3167. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1989. * Decided Jan. 9, 1990. Before FERGUSON, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Paul Jackson challenges the district court's revocation of his probation for violation of an express restitutionary condition of his plea agreement and sentence. We affirm the court's denial of Jackson's motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. I. 3 By superseding indictment dated June 16, 1986, a federal grand jury charged Jackson with numerous violations of federal law in connection with his operation of several allegedly fraudulent agriculture and business "lulling" schemes. Jackson subsequently entered into a plea agreement on February 22, 1987 which provided that he would plead guilty to one count of…