United States v. Edgar Ortiz-Grueso

892 F.2d 1047 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar ORTIZ-GRUESO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-1122. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 22, 1989. * Decided Dec. 15, 1989. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Ortiz-Grueso challenges his conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for unlawful presence in the United States after having been previously deported. He contends: (1) his indictment set forth only his April 29, 1986 deportation; (2) the April 29, 1986 deportation occurred in violation of his due process rights and could not, therefore, support his conviction; and (3) the three other deportations alleged by the government were not set forth in the indictment and could not have supported his conviction. 3 Contrary to Appellant's contentions, the indictment below did not specify any particular prior deportation, but simply alleged appellant…