United States v. Donna Thompson, Joyce Rockhold, and Alonzo Campbell

892 F.2d 1047 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna THOMPSON, Joyce Rockhold, and Alonzo Campbell, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 88-5316, 88-5317 and 88-5460. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 10, 1989. * Submission Withdrawn Aug. 11, 1989. Resubmitted Dec. 28, 1989. Decided Jan. 3, 1990. 1 Before FLETCHER and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and EARL H. CARROLL, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellants challenge the district court's denials of their motions to suppress evidence. We review the district court's findings of fact for clear error, United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 550 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987). We review the propriety of a denial of a motion to suppress de novo. United States v. Andrade, 784 F.2d 1431, 1433 (9th Cir.1986). 4 [A] person has been 'seized' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment only if, in view of all of the circumstances…