United States v. Ann Bertha Hinojos

892 F.2d 1047 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ann Bertha HINOJOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5430. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 25, 1989. * Decided Jan. 10, 1990. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Ann Hinojos appeals her conviction following jury trial on charges of conspiracy to import marijuana, importation of marijuana, conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute, and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 , 963, 841(a)(1), and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Hinojos contends on appeal that the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to support a conviction. Our review of this conviction is a deferential one; this court must affirm if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found…