Byron S. Woolley v. Robert G. Borg, Warden

892 F.2d 1048 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Byron S. WOOLLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-15647. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 22, 1989. Decided Dec. 14, 1989. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Woolley appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. A federal district court must dismiss a federal habeas petition that contains any claim for which state remedies have not been exhausted. Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 520 , 102 S.Ct. 1198 , 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982); Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989). 3 Appellant's Opening Brief alleges that he has exhausted all available state remedies. However, the findings of the magistrate, adopted by the district court's…