Jackson v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

893 F.2d 1338 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald L. JACKSON; Patricia V. Jackson, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, Western Farm Credit Bank, formerly known as Federal Land Bank Association of Sacramento, et al., Real Party in Interest. No. 89-70453. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 1989. Decided Jan. 12, 1990. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, HUG and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Donald and Patricia Jackson (the "Jacksons") petition for writ of mandamus ordering the district court to reinstate a lis pendens. Alternatively, the Jacksons request a stay of the district court's order expunging the lis pendens pending exhaustion of their appeals. 3 We have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1651 (1982). 1 Armster v. United States District Court, 806 F.2d 1347, 1351 (9th…