Rubio-Jimenez

Rubio-Jimenez v. U.S. Department of Immigration and Naturalization

Good Law
893 F.2d 1339·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 479
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 199036-3_10California914 words

Opinion

Opinion

893 F.2d 1339 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Juan RUBIO-JIMENEZ, Petitioner, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION, Respondent. No. 88-7427. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 2, 1989. * Decided Jan. 12, 1990. INS REVERSED AND REMANDED. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** FACTS 2 Jose Juan Rubio-Jimenez ("Rubio") entered the United States as a lawful resident on February 27, 1981. While in jail in Los Angeles for a drug conviction, he was served with an Order to Show Cause why he should not be deported. The back of the order read: 3 If you choose, you may be represented in this proceeding, at no expense to the Government, by an attorney or other individual authorized and qualified to represent persons before the Immigration and Naturalization Service. 4 Rubio was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.