United States v. David v. Smith, United States of America v. Matthew Koalkin

Good Law
893 F.2d 1573·1990 WL 2832·30 Fed. R. Serv. 142·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 585
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 19, 199087-3124, 87-3125California5,811 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rafeedie, J.

David Smith was convicted by a jury of operating a continuous criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848 , 36 counts of aiding and abetting the distribution and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(A), as well as three counts of interstate travel in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (a)(3). Matthew Koalkin was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 , aiding and abetting travel in interstate commerce in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (a)(2) and (3), and attempted distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 .

Smith and Koalkin appeal their convictions and raise a multiplicity of issues. The principal issue we address in this opinion is the admission of a calendar/drug ledger as a co-conspirator statement under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E). In United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682, 692 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 985 , 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986), we held that a calendar/drug ledger was inadmissible as a co-conspirator statement because the government failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.