Leon S. Kaplan v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
894 F.2d 1076·1990 WL 3827·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 676
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 199087-6646California3,508 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

Judge Leon S. Kaplan of the Los Ange-les Superior Court appeals the district court’s adverse judgment in his suit challenging the fees charged to candidates for political office by Los Angeles County for costs associated with the publication of election statements in the County’s voter’s pamphlet. Kaplan contends that the cost recovery system violates his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Because we find no constitutional infirmity in the cost recovery system, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

I.

The California Elections Code allows candidates for nonpartisan city or county offices to prepare a statement for publication in a voter’s pamphlet put out by the local government agency. Cal.Elec.Code § 10012 (West Supp.1989). The pamphlet is mailed with a sample ballot to all registered voters prior to the election. The statements of judicial candidates must be “limited to a recitation of the candidate’s own personal background and qualifications and shall not in any way make reference to other candidates for judicial office or to another candidate’s qualifications, character, or activities.” Id. § 10012.1. The Code provides for a procedure by which the public and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.