Gonzalez

United States v. Gonzalez

Good Law
894 F.2d 1344
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 199036-3_3California1,019 words

Opinion

Opinion

894 F.2d 1344 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 1989. Decided Jan. 29, 1990. Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Alberto Gonzalez appeals his conviction following a jury trial of one count of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Gonzalez's conviction occurred during the course of an undercover narcotics operation. On December 9, 1987, Juan Rodriguez, a confidential informant for the DEA, arranged for the purchase of twenty ounces of cocaine with two men, Arturo Lopez and Roberto Gonzalez (no relation to the appellant). Present at Roberto Gonzalez's house was appellant Alberto Gonzalez; he was introduced to the informant by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.