Oregon Natural Resources Council v. David Mohla

Good Law
895 F.2d 627·20 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20474·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1497
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 199089-35350California1,530 words

Opinion

Opinion

895 F.2d 627 20 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,474 OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David MOHLA, in his official capacity as Supervisor, Mt. Hood National Forest, James F. Torrence in his official capacity as Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region; United States Forest Service, an agency of the United States; and Avison Timber Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-35350. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 17, 1989. Decided Feb. 7, 1990. Victor M. Sher, Todd D. True, Corrie J. Yackulic, Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellant Oregon Natural Resources Council. Donald A. Carr, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles H. Turner, U.S. Atty., Thomas C. Lee, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., Robert L. Klarquist, Martin W. Matzen, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Val J. McLam Black, John B. Munson, Attys., Office of Gen. Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellees David Mohla, James Torrence, and the U.S. Forest Service. William F. Lenihan, Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt & Lenihan, Seattle, Wash., Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., P.C., Elizabeth Duncan Ryan, Schwabe, Williamson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.