Lawrence J. Krug v. Vince Imbordino Rufino Dominguez Arthur Hanratty Maricopa County, Az James Martin Garth Smith State of Arizona

Good Law
896 F.2d 395·1990 WL 12157·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2133
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 199088-15222California1,488 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beezer, J.

Lawrence Krug appeals pro se the district court’s order granting summary judgment in his action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 (1982). He alleges numerous improprieties in connection with a 1979 search, arrest and confinement, and a 1980 arrest, seizure of property, bail denial, confinement, and plea agreement. Because Krug’s claims are either barred by the statute of limitations or are meritless, we affirm.

I

Krug alleges that in June of 1979, Arizona deputy sheriffs Hanratty and Dominguez and others searched his apartment without a warrant and without his consent. He claims that in July of 1979, Hanratty and Dominguez arrested him for forgery without probable cause, and held him in jail for four days before he was released.

On August 16, 1979, Lawrence Krug and Anthony Lack killed a man. Krug was arrested in Dallas, Texas in July of 1980 and was charged with first degree murder and forgery. He waived extradition, and he consented to a search of his Texas apartment and car. During the search, the police seized two hundred negatives of Krug’s photographs. Krug was returned in custody to Arizona.

Krug was separated from the general population in the Maricopa County jail. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.