United States v. Ted H. Kimball

Bad Law
896 F.2d 1218·1990 WL 16959·65 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 619·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2574
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 199087-1392California2,008 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

Kimball appeals from his conviction on three counts of willful failure to file an income tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203 . On appeal, Kimball alleges several errors, including a claim that the forms he submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) constituted “returns” under the statute, thus precluding as a matter of law his conviction for failure to file a return. We agree and reverse.

I

In April 1981, after the IRS had sent him four notices of delinquency, Kimball filed an IRS Form 1040 for the year 1979 on which he wrote only asterisks in the spaces provided and signed his name “Ted Kim-ball” at the bottom of the form. The asterisks referred to a sentence stating: “This means that specific objection is made under the 5th Amendment, U.S. Constitution. Similar objection is made to the question under the 1st, 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 13th, 14th, and 16th Amendments for civil issues.” The IRS responded by sending a registered letter warning Kimball that such a submission was inadequate and might subject him to prosecution for failure to file an income tax return. Kimball acknowledged receipt of the letter.

Kimball submitted similar forms for 1980, 1981, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.