Hudson v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.

Good Law
898 F.2d 684·16 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 205·52 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,704·52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 479·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3260
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 199088-15303California1,507 words

Opinion

Opinion

898 F.2d 684 52 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 479 , 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,704 , 16 Fed.R.Serv.3d 205 Ida HUDSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC., Defendant, and Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy, a professional corporation; Wesley J. Fastiff; Henry D. Lederman; Maureen E. McClain, Appellants. No. 88-15303. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1989. Decided Feb. 27, 1990. Gary P. Scholick, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants. Marilyn Mac Rae, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before FARRIS, PREGERSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The Memorandum disposition filed December 13, 1989, is ordered amended, the disposition designated as an authored opinion for publication, and the attached Opinion is ordered filed. 2 The petition for rehearing filed December 27, 1989, is DENIED. OPINION FARRIS, Circuit Judge: 3 Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy appeals the district court's decision to assess over $6,000 in sanctions against the law firm and individual attorneys for pursuing frivolous claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.