Marquette

Marquette v. Hilton Casinos, Inc.

Good Law
899 F.2d 1225
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 199036-3California1,162 words

Opinion

Opinion

899 F.2d 1225 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank MARQUETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HILTON CASINOS, INC., dba Las Vegas Hilton, a Nevada corporation; Hilton Hotel Corporation, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellees. No. 88-15505. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1989. Decided April 10, 1990. Before REINHARDT, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Frank Marquette appeals a district court's post-trial decision that Hilton Casinos, Inc. ("Hilton") did not discriminate against him on the basis of age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 621 . We affirm. 3 * Marquette worked almost twenty years for Hilton before he was terminated in 1986 at the age of sixty-one. The man who replaced him was thirty-two. Marquette's job performance from 1967 to 1984 was satisfactory. However, when management of the casino changed hands in 1984, Marquette's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.