Jansen

900 F.2d 263 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall L. JANSEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-10270. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 10, 1990. * Decided April 17, 1990. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; Harold M. Fong, Chief District Judge, Presiding. D.Hawaii, 714 F.Supp. 428 . REVERSED. Before WALLACE, ALARCON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Jansen appeals from his conviction for a vehicular speeding offense on a federal military installation in violation of Haw.Rev.Stat. Sec. 291C-102 (1988), a state violation purportedly made federal pursuant to the Assimilative Crimes Act (Act), 18 U.S.C. Sec. 13 . He contends that federal courts do not have jurisdiction under the Act to adjudicate speeding offenses that occur within federal enclaves in Hawaii. We agree and reverse. 2 We need not engage in any extensive…