Gilbert v. Ben-Asher

Good Law
900 F.2d 1407·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5632
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 199089-15019California2,557 words

Opinion

Opinion

900 F.2d 1407 David Bruce GILBERT, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. David BEN-ASHER; J. Scott Alexander; James E. Brady, Jr.; W. Albert Brewer; Douglas N. Cerf; Richard L. Dexter; Arnold H. Dysterheft; Albert Eckstein; Michael R. Geyser; William B. Helme; Arthur N. Lindberg; Richard T. McDonald; Anna Margaret Osborn; Phillip Z. Saba; Mario P. Valdez, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-15019. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 12, 1990. Decided April 16, 1990. David Bruce Gilbert, Payson, Ariz., pro se. Clifford J. Roth, Johnston Maynard Grant & Parker, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before SNEED, FARRIS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 David Bruce Gilbert brought this suit against a number of persons 1 acting on behalf of the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners (BOMEX), for various claims arising out of the revocation of his license to practice medicine. Gilbert alleges violations of his federal civil rights under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985, intentional interference with contractual relations, intentional infliction of emotional distress, abuse of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.