Bruce Parkhurst v. Armstrong Steel Erectors, Inc.

Good Law
901 F.2d 796·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6179
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 199087-6383California1,291 words

Opinion

Opinion

901 F.2d 796 Bruce PARKHURST, Dennis Madigan, James K. Pruett, M.C. Sturgis, Jose Ward, Joe Roth, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. ARMSTRONG STEEL ERECTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Nos. 87-6383, 87-6470. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 27, 1989. Decided April 25, 1990. Peter W. Cavette, Patrick M. Hevesy, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees. Robert E. Willard, Newport Beach, Cal., for defendant-appellee-cross-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before NELSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and BROWNING, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellants, trustees of six trust funds who manage multi-employer benefit plans, appeal the district court's denial of statutory and contractual liquidated damages and the denial of interest on liquidated damages. Armstrong Steel Erectors cross-appeals challenging the award of attorneys' fees. 1. Award of Liquidated Damages 2 We review district court interpretations of federal law de novo. United States v. Mortenson, 860 F.2d 948, 949 (9th Cir.1988). We apply the same standard where the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.