Pangilinan

902 F.2d 38 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. BANK OF GUAM, a Guam corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark V. PANGILINAN; Mark V. Pangilinan, Jr.; Marks Motors, Inc., a Guam corporation; Mark's Insurance Underwriters, Inc., a Guam corporation; Ace Hardware, a Guam corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 89-15060. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1990. Decided April 30, 1990. Before FARRIS, PREGERSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Mark Pangilinan appeals the district court's finding of contempt and the resulting sanction of the prevailing party's fees and costs. The district court held that Pangilinan had issued proxy solicitations without complying with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the applicable regulations, in violation of a prior consent decree, and therefore was in contempt. The district court awarded the plaintiff, the Bank of Guam, all of the attorney's fees…