Loomis & Franklin, Inc. v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

902 F.2d 39 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. LOOMIS & FRANKLIN, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-35362. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 9, 1990. * Decided May 14, 1990. Before FARRIS, PREGERSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Loomis & Franklin (USA), Inc., (Loomis) appeals the district court's denial of Loomis's motion for summary judgment and the district court's grant of the motion for summary judgment made by the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). The district court found that the INS did not abuse its discretion when it denied Loomis's petition, on behalf of Pang Fu Huang, for a sixth preference immigrant visa. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND 3 Loomis is engaged in the import, export and distribution of fishing rods and related equipment manufactured…