Bretz

United States v. Bretz

Good Law
902 F.2d 41·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6764
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 199036-3_17California514 words

Opinion

Opinion

902 F.2d 41 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. L.R. BRETZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87-4458. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 1990. Decided April 30, 1990. Before WALLACE, SKOPIL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 On August 29, 1978, A.J. Haider ("Haider") filed a mechanic's lien ("the Haider lien") against property located in Montana and owned by Augusta Lievens ("the Lievens property"). On or about March 8, 1982 the Haider lien was assigned to the appellant, L.R. Bretz. On March 2, 1984 the United States sued in federal court to foreclose a mortgage on the Lievens property. Appellant was named as a defendant. 3 Under Montana law, appellant carried the burden of establishing the validity of the Haider lien. Tri-County Plumbing and Heating, Inc. v. Levee Restorations, Inc., 720 P.2d 247, 251 (Mont.1986). Appellant attempted to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.