Jablonski
United States v. Jablonski
Opinion
Opinion
902 F.2d 1580 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Bryan JABLONSKI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50398. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1990. Decided May 10, 1990. Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and TANG and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Mark B. Jablonski ("Jablonski") appeals the district court's decision to revoke his probation. We affirm. DISCUSSION 1. Denial of Continuance 3 Jablonski asserts that the district court abused its discretion when it refused to grant his continuance to litigate the underlying state charge. Jablonski also contends that the lack of a continuance violated his due process rights. 4 (i) Was the denial of a continuance an abuse of discretion? 5 We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the continuance for three reasons. First, Jablonski was not diligent in resolving the…