United States v. Pedro Vizcarra-Angulo

Good Law
904 F.2d 22·1990 WL 69249·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 199089-50397California491 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boochever, J.

Pedro Vizcarra-Angulo appeals his forty-month sentence for conspiracy to possess heroin with intent to distribute. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

On April 24, 1989, Vizcarra-Angulo pled guilty to one count of violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) (1988). In return for his cooperation, the government agreed to recommend a forty-month sentence, which is below the statutory minimum of five years. The presentence report had calculated a sentence of eighty-seven months in custody under the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court accepted the government’s recommendation, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (e) (1988), sentenced Vizcarra-Angulo to forty months imprisonment. See United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1 (Oct. 15, 1988) (court may depart downward from guidelines upon motion of the government stating defendant has provided sub stantial assistance to authorities; sentence below statutory mandatory minimum may be justified).

Vizcarra-Angulo now asserts that the departure downward to forty months was insufficient because he is functionally illiterate, unsophisticated, and was victimized by his coconspirators. At the sentencing hearing,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.