Olivar
Olivar v. Evenflo Juvenile Furniture
Opinion
Opinion
904 F.2d 41 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel D. OLIVAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EVENFLO JUVENILE FURNITURE; Gonzalo Barba; Furniture Workers Union, Local 3161, Defendants-Appellees. 1 No. 89-55394. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 11, 1990. Decided May 25, 1990. 3 Before REINHARDT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and DAVID R. THOMPSON, District Judge * . 4 MEMORANDUM ** 5 There is no genuine issue of material fact that could have prevented the district court from concluding that Olivar was covered under the collective bargaining agreement that was in effect during his employment. From this fact, the district court correctly concluded that section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 185 (a), preempts Olivar's state-law claims. Young v. Anthony's Fish Grottos, Inc., 830 F.2d 993, 997-98, 999 (9th Cir.1987); Chmiel v. Beverly Wilshire Hotel Co., 873 F.2d 1283, 1286 (9th…