Villa

United States v. Villa

Good Law
904 F.2d 42·1990 WL 71481
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 199036-3_8California1,175 words

Opinion

Opinion

904 F.2d 42 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rito Andres VILLA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-30037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1989. Decided May 24, 1990. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, TANG and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Rito Villa appeals his conviction of one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. He alleges invalidity of the search warrant and error in admission of firearms evidence. We affirm. DISCUSSION 1. Search Warrant 3 Villa contends that the evidence seized pursuant to the search warrant (including an assult rifle) should have been excluded. He claims that the warrant was invalid for three reasons. First, he asserts that the warrant lacked probable cause because (1) the warrant was facially deficient; (2) any possible allegations in the warrant regarding Villa were stale; and (3) no nexus was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.