Fmc

Fmc v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes

Good Law
905 F.2d 1311·53 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,020·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9651
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 199089-35349California2,197 words

Opinion

Opinion

905 F.2d 1311 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,020 , 59 USLW 2020 FMC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES, et al., acting By and Through its Tero Commission aka The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Tribal Employment Rights Commission and its individual Commissioners, Arnold Appenay, Al Timsanico, Marvin Osborne and R. Willis Dixey; Shoshone Bannock Tribal Court; Honorable Charles H. Lonah; Honorable Robert Gonzales, Defendants-Appellants. No. 89-35349. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 9, 1990. Decided June 18, 1990. Jeanette Wolfley, General Counsel, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Fort Hall, Idaho, for defendants-appellants. Gary L. Cooper, Racine, Olson, Nye, Cooper & Budge, Pocatello, Idaho, for plaintiff-appellee. Melody L. McCoy, Boulder, Colo., for amicus, Native American Rights Fund. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. Before FARRIS, PREGERSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. FARRIS, Circuit Judge: 1 This case presents the question of the extent of power Indian tribes have over non-Indians acting on fee land located within the confines of a reservation. The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes are attempting to enforce a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.