United States v. Zolin

Good Law
905 F.2d 1344·30 Fed. R. Serv. 44·66 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5965·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9838
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 199085-6065California728 words

Opinion

Opinion

905 F.2d 1344 66 A.F.T.R.2d 90 -5965, 91-1 USTC P 50,147 , 30 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 44 UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Frank S. ZOLIN, Respondent/Appellee, and Church of Scientology of California and Mary Sue Hubbard, Intervenors/Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Nos. 85-6065, 85-6105. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 20, 1990. Gary R. Allen, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner/appellee/cross-appellant. Eric M. Lieberman, Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Kninsky & Lieberman, New York City, for intervenors/appellants/cross-appellees. Frederick Bennett, County Counsel, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent/appellee. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. FARRIS, Circuit Judge: 1 The facts of this case are set forth in our previous opinion, United States v. Zolin, 809 F.2d 1411 (9th Cir.1987), aff'd in part and vacated in part, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2619 , 105 L.Ed.2d 469 (1989). We now resolve whether tapes of two meetings of the Mission Corporate Category Sortout project are admissible under the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.