United States v. Jairo Hernandez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 202220-17328California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-17328

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:14-cr-00120-EMC-6 v.

JAIRO HERNANDEZ, AKA Joker, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and CHOE-GROVES,** Judge.

Jairo Hernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his

U.S.C. § 2255 habeas motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Reviewing de novo, see United States v. Zuno-Arce, 339 F.3d 886, 888 (9th Cir.

2003), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. The district court permissibly concluded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.