United States v. Edward Wright

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 202220-10303California1,515 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10303

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cr-00012-MMD-

WGC-

v.

EDWARD WRIGHT, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 15, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,** District Judge.

On January 28, 2019, Timothy Bennett (“Bennett”) told Detective Laura

Thomsen (“Thomsen”) that he had found about twenty images of child pornography

on Edward Wright’s (“Wright”) tablet depicting children ranging from about four to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. ten years old. Bennett said he had seen these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.