Sukhwinder Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 202220-70522California1,280 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUKHWINDER SINGH, No. 20-70522

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-194-142

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 9, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: COLLINS and LEE, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,*** Judge.

Sukhwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of a decision

by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an immigration judge’s (IJ)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

the Convention Against Torture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.