Daisy Alvarez v. Sheraton Operating Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 202221-55562California432 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JAN 6 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAISY ALVAREZ, No. 21-55562

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-03608-TJH-JC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SHERATON OPERATING

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation;

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants,

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Defendants-appellants Sheraton Operating Corporation and Marriott

International, Inc., appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to

compel arbitration. The district court applied California law in holding that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. appellants waived their right to compel arbitration by its active litigation of the

case over thirteen months. On appeal, appellants contend that the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.