Moy v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
906 F.2d 467 David MOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Zip Temporary Personnel Services Corporation; Terri Smith; Susan Scarborough; Lorry Bishop; Leonard Fwartz; Mary Meumier, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-15700. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 4, 1990 * . Decided June 27, 1990. David Moy, Berkeley, Cal., in pro. per. Susan L. Kamlet, Asst. U.S. Atty., William T. McGivern, Jr., U.S. Atty., Stephen L. Schirle, Chief, Civ. Div., Alberto E. Gonzalez, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Peter J. Pfister and Judith M. Schelly, Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee Zip Temporary Personnel Services and individual defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before SNEED, FARRIS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: 1 David Moy ("Moy") appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider its order requiring pre-filing review of any complaints he might file in the district court in the future. We modify the district court's order and otherwise affirm. BACKGROUND FACTS 2 On September 7,…