Young

Young v. United States

Good Law
907 F.2d 156·1990 WL 90381
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 199036-3_1California1,376 words

Opinion

Opinion

907 F.2d 156 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Everett C. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. 1 No. 88-15509. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 5, 1990. * Decided June 25, 1990. 3 Before NELSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and ALBERT L. STEPHENS, Jr., Senior District Judge. ** 4 MEMORANDUM *** OVERVIEW 5 Appellant/Plaintiff Everett C. Young filed a complaint and volumes of motions, memoranda and other material in the district court alleging, inter alia, that NASA had used his inventions in the Apollo and Gemini spacecraft without paying him or providing him with any awards, that the Court of Claims decision holding that NASA had not used his invention was in error, and that NASA had refused to grant him an opportunity in a hearing to persuade NASA that his Orbital Sentinel System would contribute to the space program, and that he should be awarded money from NASA for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.