Ramzan Chaudhry v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 7 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAMZAN ALI CHAUDHRY, No. 20-70482 Petitioner, Agency No. A072-175-541 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 12, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: NGUYEN and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,*** District Judge. Dissent by Judge COLLINS.
Ramzan Ali Chaudhry, a citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen his
removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under § 242 of the Immigration and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by…