Lynette Akamin v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 7, 202220-70590California1,081 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 7 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

LYNETTE ASHEY AKAMIN, No. 20-70590

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-822-217

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 7, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, WATFORD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Lynette Ashey Akamin, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for

review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding the

order of the immigration judge (“IJ”) denying her applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“Torture Convention”). We have jurisdiction under § 242 of the Immigration and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.