Chicano Education and Manpower Services v. United States Department of Labor, Seattle-King County Employment and Training Consortium (Hereinafter "Consortium") v. United States Department of Labor
Opinion
Opinion
909 F.2d 1320 CHICANO EDUCATION AND MANPOWER SERVICES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. SEATTLE-KING COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM (Hereinafter "Consortium"), Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. Nos. 88-7187, 89-70208. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 4, 1990. Decided July 27, 1990. Steve Fredrickson, Evergreen Legal Services, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner Chicano Educ. and Manpower Services. Robert H. Alsdorf, Armstrong, Alsdorf, Bradbury & Maier, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner Seattle-King County Employment and Training Consortium. Charles I. Hadden, Anne Payne Fuggett and Jeffrey A. Hennemuth, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Labor. Before WRIGHT, WALLACE and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: 1 Chicano Education and Manpower Services (CEMS) and the Seattle-King County Employment and Training Consortium (Consortium) petition for review of a decision of the Secretary of Labor holding them jointly and severally liable for repayment of funds spent in violation of…