Chicano Education and Manpower Services v. United States Department of Labor, Seattle-King County Employment and Training Consortium (Hereinafter "Consortium") v. United States Department of Labor

Good Law
909 F.2d 1320·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12480
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 199089-70208California4,146 words

Opinion

Opinion

909 F.2d 1320 CHICANO EDUCATION AND MANPOWER SERVICES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. SEATTLE-KING COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM (Hereinafter "Consortium"), Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. Nos. 88-7187, 89-70208. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 4, 1990. Decided July 27, 1990. Steve Fredrickson, Evergreen Legal Services, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner Chicano Educ. and Manpower Services. Robert H. Alsdorf, Armstrong, Alsdorf, Bradbury & Maier, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner Seattle-King County Employment and Training Consortium. Charles I. Hadden, Anne Payne Fuggett and Jeffrey A. Hennemuth, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Labor. Before WRIGHT, WALLACE and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: 1 Chicano Education and Manpower Services (CEMS) and the Seattle-King County Employment and Training Consortium (Consortium) petition for review of a decision of the Secretary of Labor holding them jointly and severally liable for repayment of funds spent in violation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.