Heinlen

909 F.2d 1488 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dennis Jay HEINLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sandy SKELTON, Classification Programs Supervisor, ASPC, Douglas, AZ; Larry Hughes, Deputy Warden, ASPC, Douglas, AZ; Samuel Lewis, Director, ADOC, Phoenix, AZ; Duane Vild, Warden, ASPC, Douglas, AZ, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-2557. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 25, 1990. * Decided July 31, 1990. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dennis Jay Heinlen, an inmate, filed this action against various officials of the Arizona Department of Corrections under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 , alleging they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the eighth and fourteenth amendments. Specifically, he claims they failed to respond to his need for transfer to another facility after medical personnel had determined he suffered from an allergic reaction to an…