Watson
Watson v. Clark
Opinion
Opinion
909 F.2d 1490 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Melvin L. WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Drennan A. CLARK, Defendant, and Fred WEDOW, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-16008. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 16, 1990. Decided Aug. 2, 1990. Before TANG, NOONAN and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Melvin L. Watson, a former colonel in the Nevada National Guard, sued Fred Wedow, a former major in the Nevada National Guard, and several others, alleging eight causes of action. Watson then voluntarily dismissed his claims against all defendants except Wedow. The district court dismissed with prejudice all the claims against Wedow, two of them for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the grounds that intramilitary immunity prevented Watson's suit. Wedow appeals the dismissal of these two claims. We affirm. ALLEGATIONS 3 Watson in his complaint alleged the following: 4 Watson had full-time employment…