Rosenthal v. Justices Of The Supreme Court Of California

Good Law
910 F.2d 561·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12645
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 199088-15709California3,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

910 F.2d 561 116 Lab.Cas. P 10,334 Jerome B. ROSENTHAL, Esq., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA; Allen Broussard; Edward Panelli; John A. Arguelles; David N. Eagleson; Mildred Lillie; Vaino Spencer; Marcus Kaufman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-15709. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 13, 1990. Decided Aug. 1, 1990. Jerome B. Rosenthal, Los Angeles, Cal., pro se. Daniel G. Stone and Cathy A. Neff, Deputy Attys. Gen., Sacramento, Cal. and Lawrence C. Yee, State Bar of California, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before HERBERT Y.C. CHOY, THOMAS TANG and ROBERT R. BEEZER, Circuit Judges. BEEZER, Circuit Judge: 1 Rosenthal appeals the district court's dismissal of his action against the justices of the California Supreme Court and officers of the state bar association arising out of his disbarment. We affirm. 2 Rosenthal was disbarred by the California Supreme Court on the recommendation of the Hearing Panel of the California State Bar and its Review Department. See Rosenthal v. State Bar of California, 43 Cal.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.