Excess Ins. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., British Aviation Ins. Co., Ltd., Threadneedle Ins. Co., Ltd., Trident Ins. Co., Ltd., Scottish Lion Ins. Co., Ltd., Mentor Ins. Co., Ltd., Per Mentor Underwriting Agents (Uk), Ltd., London & Hull Maritime Ins. Co., Ltd., Bishopgate Ins. Co., Ltd., River Thames Ins. Co., Ltd., River Trans. & Gen. Ins. Co., Ltd., Ulter Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., Andrew Weir Ins. Co., Provintial Ins. Co. Ltd., British Law

Good Law

912 F.2d 468

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 199087-3858California97 words

Opinion

912 F.2d 468 Excess Ins. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., British Aviation Ins. Co., Ltd., Threadneedle Ins. Co., Ltd., Trident Ins. Co., Ltd., Scottish Lion Ins. Co., Ltd., Mentor Ins. Co., Ltd., Per Mentor Underwriting Agents (UK), Ltd., London & Hull Maritime Ins. Co., Ltd., Bishopgate Ins. Co., Ltd., River Thames Ins. Co., Ltd., River Trans. & Gen. Ins. Co., Ltd., Ulter Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., Andrew Weir Ins. Co., Provintial Ins. Co. Ltd., British Law NO. 87-3858 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. AUG 30, 1990 Appeal From: D.Alaska 1 AFFIRMED.