Alvarado-Gonzalez

United States v. Alvarado-Gonzalez

Good Law
912 F.2d 470
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 28, 199036-3_24California536 words

Opinion

Opinion

912 F.2d 470 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando ALVARADO-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50014 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 14, 1990. * Decided Aug. 28, 1990. MEMORANDUM ** Before WALLACE, ALARCON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 Fernando Alvarado-Gonzalez appeals the district court's pretrial ruling excluding as irrelevant evidence of a third party's "other acts". We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988). We review the district court's conclusions regarding the admissibility of evidence for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Barry, 814 F.2d 1400, 1401 (9th Cir.1987). We affirm. 2 Alvarado-Gonzalez was indicted for conspiracy to import and importing two hundred kilograms of cocaine, and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute two hundred kilograms of cocaine. The basis for these charges was that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.