Taechaphanarat

912 F.2d 471 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suvit TAECHAPHANARAT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50382. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 6, 1990. Decided Aug. 24, 1990. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; William D. Keller, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before POOLE, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Suvit Taechaphanarat appeals his sentence following a guilty plea for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (Count One of the indictment), aiding and abetting the importation of heroin (Count Six of the indictment) and aiding and abetting the attempted importation of heroin (Count Ten of the indictment) in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 848 , 952, 960 and 963 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 . We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Between 1984 and 1988, Appellant, a…