Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,613 in Re Tucson Estates, Inc., Debtor. Alphus Christensen Homer Lawrence Thomas Ward v. Tucson Estates, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Debtor-Appellee. Alphus Christensen Homer Lawrence Thomas Ward, Gordon Cox Randall Newman Murray Samuell, Jr., Intervenors-Appellants v. Tucson Estates, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Debtor-Appellee

Good Law
912 F.2d 1162
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 199088-15745California4,209 words

Opinion

Opinion

912 F.2d 1162 Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,613 In re TUCSON ESTATES, INC., Debtor. Alphus CHRISTENSEN; Homer Lawrence; Thomas Ward, Petitioners-Appellants, v. TUCSON ESTATES, INC., an Arizona corporation, Debtor-Appellee. Alphus CHRISTENSEN; Homer Lawrence; Thomas Ward, Petitioners-Appellees, Gordon Cox; Randall Newman; Murray Samuell, Jr., Intervenors-Appellants, v. TUCSON ESTATES, INC., an Arizona corporation, Debtor-Appellee. Nos. 88-15745, 88-15776. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 12, 1990. Decided Aug. 30, 1990. John A. Baade, Miller & Pitt, Tucson, Ariz., for petitioners-appellants-appellees. Robert E. Miles, Streich, Lang, Weeks & Cardon, Phoenix, Ariz., for intervenors-appellants. Scott H. Gan, Mesch, Clark, & Rothschild, Tucson, Ariz., for debtor-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before FLETCHER, PREGERSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 Petitioners-appellants appeal the district court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court's stay of their state litigation against the debtor, Tucson Estates, Inc., and its three sole shareholders, who are also its officers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.